Recently, the Turkish Competition Authority (“TCA”) has published its reasoned decision in which it conditionally cleared the merger transaction, planned through the incorporation of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (“FCA”) and Peugeot S.A. (“PSA”) into FCA. In this regard, especially two points have aroused curiosity: (i) what would be the competitive concerns that may arise after the transaction is realised and (ii) how the commitments submitted by the transaction parties found sufficient in order to eliminate the relevant competitive concerns? Let’s have a look at these questions’ answers together within this article.
The Effects of the Transaction on the Light Commercial Vehicle Market Have Been Closely Scrutinised
Within the scope of the TCA’s detailed examinations, it has been concluded that the transaction will not lead to competitive concerns on the market for the production and sales of passenger cars. However, the TCA evaluated that the transaction would raise competition concerns on the market for the production and sale of light commercial vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 tons. In this context, (i) the structural link between FCA and Ford due to the fact that their distributions are made by the same holding in Turkey and (ii) the market shares and concentration ratios of the undertakings in the relevant market have been particularly taken into consideration. Accordingly, since it was evaluated that the transaction would increase concentration on the market for the production and sale of light commercial vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 tons, whether the transaction results in a significant lessening of effective competition was examined in detail as will be discussed below.
The Market Structure is Convenience to Coordination!
Within this framework, first of all, it was underlined that entry to the market is difficult. Indeed, it was stated that the number of new models to enter the market is limited, and, thus, those would not have a distorting effect on the coordination risk of the undertakings that are already ahead in terms of the number of models and have a structural link between them. The low product differentiation and the high-capacity utilisation rate of the undertakings were also interpreted as factors demonstrating the fact that the market is convenientto coordination.
Again, the existence of multi-market relations between the undertakings in the market, was also evaluated as one of the reasons that increase the coordination risk.
Furthermore, given that the relevant market under investigation is not characterised by sparse and large-volume sales as well as considering the number of customers, it was concluded that it is not possible to say that the buyers have the ability to determine the purchase conditions alone. Accordingly, it was stated that there is no balancing buyer power in the market.
The TCA also concluded that the market is transparent, and this transparency may facilitate possible coordination. In this context, the fact that much commercial information such as sales prices, campaigns, sales amounts of the undertakings are published on public platforms, and that commercial information is frequently shared by Automotive Distributors Association (“ADA”) and Automotive Industry Association (“AIA”) were seen as factors that increase transparency. Accordingly, transparency was interpreted as another element demonstrating the fact that the market is convenient to coordination.
Is It Possible to Maintain this Coordination?
As stated above, the TCA concluded that the concentration level would be increased in the market following the transaction, and an agreement on the coordinated behaviours can be easily achieved. In this context, the sustainability of possible coordination was examined under three conditions which are set out in the Guidelines on the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers and Acquisitions.
The first of these conditions is whether the undertakings involved in the coordination would adequately monitor whether the coordination conditions are complied with. It was concluded that the first condition was met given the transparency of the market and the structural link between FCA and FORD because of the fact that their distributions are made by the same holding as mentioned above.
The second condition is whether there are some deterrent mechanisms to be operated if deviations from coordination are detected. In this context, the importance of retaliation mechanisms being credible was emphasised. It was stated that this condition was also met, considering the existence of transparency in the market and the existence of multi-market relations between competitors.
The third condition is whether the results expected from coordination are not endangered by units outside the scope of coordination, such as customers and current or future competitors that are not within the scope of coordination. The fact that the competitors are less likely to play a discoordinating role due to their position in the market and that there is no balancing buyer power in the market constituted the basis for the assessment that this condition is met.
Given that these three conditions were met, it was evaluated that possible coordination in the market is sustainable. Accordingly, it was concluded that the transaction would significantly lessen effective competition on the market for the production and sale of light commercial vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 tons through coordinated effects.
Will the Commitments Submitted by the Transaction Parties Be an Effective Remedy?
|Commitments Submitted by FCA:||Commitments Submitted by Koç Holding|
|FCA undertakes to establish a confidentiality policy within the 60 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties, for the members of TOFAŞ board of directors to keep confidential any confidential information they may obtain as a result of their duties, including competitively sensitive information, and to use them only for the performance of their duties.
|Koç Holding undertakes that the person who is currently a member of both TOFAŞ and FORD’s board of directors, will cease to be a board member in one of FORD or TOFAŞ as of the 30th business day following the closing of the transaction.|
|In order to protect the confidentiality of this information, FCA undertakes to establish confidentiality policy within the 60 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties, that will be applied to all TOFAŞ employee who have access to competitively sensitive information and that determines the measures to be taken for the protection of such data.||As of the closing of the transaction, Koç Holding will not be able to appoint any person who is a member of TOFAŞ board of directors to FORD board of directors, and any person who is a member of FORD board of directors to TOFAŞ board of directors.|
|FCA undertakes to sign a specific confidentiality agreement with Koç Holding on the protection of all kinds of confidential information, including competitively sensitive information, that Koç Holding and FCA have due to their partnership in TOFAŞ, within 60 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties.||Koç Holding undertakes to sign a confidentiality agreement with FCA within 60 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties, regarding the protection of all kinds of confidential information, including competitively sensitive information, that Koç Holding and FCA have due to their partnership in TOFAŞ.|
|FCA undertakes to ensure that TOFAŞ employees involved in the provision, receipt and processing of competitively sensitive information receive annual competition law trainings explaining their responsibilities on protecting such information and not disclosing this information to third parties, including competitors.||Koç Holding undertakes to ensure that every employee who has competitively sensitive information of both TOFAŞ and FORD, due to their duties at Koç Holding, sign a confidentiality agreement within 60 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties. The said confidentiality agreement will set forth the obligations regarding the processing of competitively sensitive information of TOFAŞ and FORD.|
|FCA undertakes to submit a report to the TCA describing in detail the measures taken to fulfil the commitments within 90 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties.||Koç Holding undertakes to submit a report to the TCA describing in detail the measures taken to fulfil the commitments set out in Articles I and IV above within 90 calendar days from the date of notification of the short decision to the transaction parties.|
Within this context, it was emphasised that there is a structural link between FCA and FORD, which may be called third-party shareholder and interdependent management. The TCA evaluated that this link would enable the transfer of strategic commercial information, especially between the competitors, and increase the motivation of the parties to reach a common understanding of coordination as well as the possibilities of maintaining the coordination.
In this regard, the TCA examined the information provided by TOFAŞ and FORD OTOSAN to Koç Holding’s board of directors and related departments. As a result of this review, the TCA underlined that the information includes commercially sensitive information such as the company’s production and sales amounts, market performance indicators, annual strategy planning information, foreseen production and sales amounts, planned investments and other planning information.
The TCA has considered the commitments submitted by FCA and Koç Holding in two ways. The first one, commitment number I, which Koç Holding submitted, concerns the termination of the structural link between FCA and FORD in the form of interdependent management. Accordingly, Koç Holding has committed that the person, who is currently a member of both TOFAŞ and FORD’s board of directors, will cease to be a board member in one of FORD or TOFAŞ. With commitment number II, Koç Holding undertakes that any person who is a member of the board of directors of TOFAŞ and FORD OTOSAN will not be appointed to the board of directors of another. The TCA evaluated these commitments as a factor limiting the common understanding between the parties by ending one of the structural links between FCA and FORD. However, since Koç Holding will continue to be a third-party shareholder between FCA and Ford, the commitment to appointing any person as a member of both TOFAŞ and FORD OTOSAN’S board of directors was not considered sufficient.
It was concluded that the possible coordination risk arising out of the structural link would be prevented via the firewall measure and confidentiality agreement commitments, along with other commitments.
Consequently, evaluating all the commitments together, the TCA concluded that these commitments could eliminate the risk of information sharing and coordination, and accordingly, the transaction was cleared conditionally.
The EU Commission Had Similar Concerns with the TCA
Within the scope of the examination made by the European Commission (“Commission”), also there were concerns that the transaction may harm competition in the market for small light commercial vehicles since, as stated above, the companies have high market shares and are close competitors. Therefore, the companies submitted commitments in order to eliminate these concerns. The commitments submitted by FCA and PSA summarised as follows:
- Enabling Toyota to compete effectively with the merged entity in the relevant markets in the future, an extension of the cooperation agreement currently in force between PSA and Toyota Motor for small light commercial vehicles under which PSA produces the vehicles for sale by Toyota under the Toyota brand mainly in the European Union.
- To facilitate new entrants to expand and compete in the markets for light commercial vehicles, the amendment of the “repair and maintenance” agreements for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles in force between PSA, FCA and their repairer networks.
After the examination above the commitments, it was stated that the commitment package allows the maintenance of effective competition in the market after the transaction and, therefore, fully addresses all of the Commission’s competition concerns.
To sum up, it was evaluated that after the transaction, there would be coordinated effects in the market for production and sale of light commercial vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 tons, which would lead to a significant lessening of effective competition. However, the TCA concluded that the commitments submitted by FCA and Koç Holding would be sufficient to eliminate these competitive concerns and granted conditional clearance to the transaction.
 The TCA’s decision dated 30.12.2020 and numbered 20-57/794-354.
 It should be noted that the structural link between FCA and Ford is unique to Turkey. Koç Holding, one of the largest companies in Turkey, has joint control in FORD OTOSAN (Ford) and TOFAŞ (Fiat).
 TOFAŞ, a Koç Group – FCA joint venture, mainly manufactures and imports Fiat branded passenger and light commercial cars.
 As mentioned above, vehicles belonging to Ford and FCA are distributed by Koç Holding.
 For detailed information, please see: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2506
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Competition Law Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer Competition Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers are coping with increased volume & complexity of information. Kluwer Competition Law enables you to make more informed decisions, more quickly from every preferred location. Are you, as a competition lawyer, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer Competition Law can support you.