Some statistics to feed the debate on the checks and balances of the EU antitrust enforcement system: any comments? 
(click on “read more” to get the formatting right)

Cartel Cases Adjudicated by the General Court
  1995-2005 (226) 2006-2009 (56)
Full annulment 6% (14) 16% (9)*
Partial annulment and/or reduction in fines 56% (127) 27% (15)
Dismissal 38% (85) 57% (32)

*  All those decisions were re-adopted by the Commission subsequently, with fines.

Cartel Cases Adjudicated by the Court of Justice
  1995-2005 (41) 2006-2009 (23)
Full/partial annulment and/or reduction in fines 20% (8) 9% (2)*
Dismissal 80% (33) 91% (21)

*  One judgment led to a significant reduction in fine and the other to full annulment, which led to the subsequent re-adoption of the annulled decision.

** Opinions of the Advocate General have been followed by the ECJ in approximately 90% of the appeals over the 2000-2005 period; the ratio fell to 70% over the 2006-2009 period.

Average Duration of Cartel Cases before the EU Courts (months)

 

General Court

Court of Justice

1995-2005

40 (27-58)

35 (28-44)

2006-2009

53 (32-75)

24 (13-28)

NB: cut-off date: December 31, 2009.


________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Competition Law Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer Competition Law

The 2021 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 78% of the law firms realise the impact of transformational technologies. Kluwer Competition Law is a superior functionality with a wealth of exclusive content. The tool enables you to make more informed decisions, more quickly from every preferred location. Are you, as a competition lawyer, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer Competition Law can support you.

Kluwer Competition Law
This page as PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *