Private actions

Advocate General, Damages, Disclosure, European Court of Justice, Evidence, Private actions, Private enforcement

(Latham & Watkins LLP) and (University of Vienna, Austria)/ /Leave a comment

Recent posts on this blog (here) have already highlighted the role that the adoption of Directive 2014/104/EU (Damages Directive or Directive) and the European Commission’s (EC) decision in case AT.39824 – Trucks, amongst other events, have played as turning points in private enforcement of competition law in the EU. The Directive has led not only…

Advocate General, Damages, European Union, Limitation Period, Private actions, Private enforcement

(Universitat Pompeu Fabra)/ /Leave a comment

Advocate General Rantos delivered his Opinion in a request of a preliminary ruling by a Spanish court (case C-267/20), the Audiencia Provincial of León, the appellate court in a trucks’ cartel damages claim. In particular, Advocate General Rantos Opinion deals with the temporal scope of application of the Damages Directive; the “substantive” or “procedural” nature…

Damages, Fair Fund, Leniency, Private actions, Private enforcement

(University of Vienna, Austria)/ /Leave a comment

Europe’s leniency programs face a problem. Creating an incentive for private enforcement with the 2014 Damages Directive came at the expense of leniency applications all over the EU. A further balance of public and private enforcement will be necessary. Many approaches have been discussed. Recently, calls for exemptions or limitations of civil liability for leniency…

Abuse of dominance, European Court of Justice, European Union, Jurisdiction clauses, Private actions

, (McCann FitzGerald)/ /Leave a comment

The European Court of Justice (CJEU) held recently in Apple Sales International v MJA acting as liquidator of eBizcuss.com[1] that claims alleging abuse of a dominant position could come within the terms of a jurisdiction clause even where the clause did not expressly refer to claims based on competition law.   Relevant Rules The rules…