Jurisdiction

Abuse of dominance, App stores, Apple, National competition authorities (NCAs), National court, Netherlands

(Leiden University)/ /Leave a comment

The Dutch case concerning the Apple App Store appears to make a (welcome) comeback. The case that started in 2019 came to a rather disappointing end in the summer of 2022 when the Dutch competition authority issued a public statement that gave the impression that it was satisfied with Apple’s adjustments to the App Store…

Brazil, Labour market, Merger regulation, Mergers

, (Federal University of Paraná)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction The debate about expanding competition law goals is a hot topic in the global competition policy agenda. The return of the antitrust debate in public opinion, due to the rise of Big Techs, opened the path to new proposals regarding sustainability, democracy, innovation, and inequality as competition goals or objectives. This new agenda has…

Apple, Apps, National competition authorities (NCAs), National court, Netherlands

, (Bird & Bird)/ /Leave a comment

On 2 October 2023, the Dutch competition authority ACM published its decision on the objections filed by Apple on 13 July 2023 (decision on objection) against the ACM’s decision of 24 August 2021 imposing an order subject to periodic penalty payments on Apple for infringing the abuse of dominance provision laid down in Article 24…

Double jeopardy, Italy, Procedures, Proportionality, References for a preliminary ruling

(University of Roma Tre)/ /1 Comment

The contested decision With decision No. 30086 of 29th March 2022, the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) imposed a fine of more than 3.7 million euros on Caronte & Tourist S.p.A. (CT) for excessive pricing in the market for Strait of Messina’s ferry services for passengers with vehicles, where it holds a dominant position. The legal…

Collective Redress, Competition and Markets Authority, Damages, Uncategorized, United Kingdom

(University of Strathclyde)/ /Leave a comment

This is an exciting time to be involved in competition law litigation in the UK. There are numerous claims before the specialist competition court in the UK and, in particular, it is notable that we are witnessing a surge in applications under the new consumer collective opt-out redress provisions introduced by the Consumer Rights Act…

Collective Redress, Damages, Digital, European Court of Justice, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction clauses, Jurisdictional clause

(Lindenbaum)/ /Leave a comment

The District Court of Amsterdam indicated in a decision published on 22 August 2023 that it intends to refer preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on regional jurisdiction (also referred to as ‘territorial’ jurisdiction) in the context of a WAMCA (Act on Damages Claims in a Collective Action) collective action claim brought…

Competition policy, Competition proceedings, European Court of Justice, Fundamental rights, Guidelines, Türkiye

, , (ACTECON)/ /Leave a comment

With its decision issued on 30 March 2023 (Storytel Decision), the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) evaluated Storytel Turkey Yayıncılık Hizmetleri A.Ş.’s (Storytel) claim that some documents obtained during on-site inspections were covered by attorney-client privilege. This post presents a comparative analysis of the TCA’s approach regarding attorney-client privilege presented in the Storytel decision and the…

Anticompetitive agreements, Guidelines, Netherlands, Sustainability

, , (Bird & Bird)/ /Leave a comment

More than three years after it published the first draft guidelines on sustainability agreements, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) adopted a final policy rule titled ‘ACM’s oversight of sustainability agreements’ (Policy Rule). The Policy Rule aims at providing insight into how the ACM applies competition rules to sustainability agreements and how the…

Abuse of dominance, Damages, National court, Portugal, Private actions, Private enforcement, Regulation

(Universidade do Porto)/ /1 Comment

On September 25th the Lisbon Court of Appeal (TRL) upheld the essence of a 2022 ruling by the Portuguese Competition Court, which in turn had already upheld the 2019 decision of the Portuguese Competition Authority (PCAC) in the EDP case, condemning it to a fine of €40 million – the largest fine ever imposed in…

Abuse of dominance, Czech Republic, Damages, European Court of Justice, National court, Private actions, Private enforcement

, (Skils)/ /Leave a comment

Summary of Facts On 21 September 2023 the Advocate General Juliane Kokott presented her opinion in the Case C-605/21, Heureka Group a.s. v. Google LLC. The opinion addresses a request for a preliminary ruling from the Prague Municipal Court, which is hearing Heureka’s follow-on action against Google based on the Commission’s Decision C(2017) 4444 final…